top of page

The Bigger Picture: Why Manzambi Is More Than Just Morgan Rogers’ Replacement

Writer: Jake Carter
Jake Carter
Aug 15
4 min read

By Jake Carter


Johan Manzambi looks like the natural successor to Morgan Rogers, but the departure of Youri Tielemans changes the context of Aston Villa’s midfield rebuild. His value could lie not in replacing either player directly, but in occupying the tactical space between them.


Manzambi arrived from Freiburg on 17 July, four days before Rogers completed his move to Chelsea. Both can receive in advanced midfield areas, turn towards goal and carry Villa up the pitch.


The other major gap in Aston Villa’s midfield was left by Youri Tielemans. Tielemens joined Manchester United on 14 July, three days before Manzambi arrived.


Rogers, Manzambi and Tielemans all move Villa forward in different ways. Rogers’ progression comes primarily through carrying, receiving between the lines before using power and dribbling to drive directly at defenders. Tielemans operates from deeper positions, relying more on awareness and passing to organise Villa’s progression. Manzambi sits somewhere between the two: he can receive between the lines or from deeper areas, beat pressure with his turn and acceleration, and then link phases by carrying possession forward.


Why the Rogers comparison works


Rogers gave Villa a route up the pitch that did not depend on the perfect passing sequence. He could take possession with a defender tight behind him, turn through contact and carry the ball 20 or 30 yards. When an attack became slow or predictable, he could create momentum almost by himself. That directness forced opponents into difficult decisions: stepping out to confront him created space elsewhere, while backing away allowed him to continue towards the penalty area.


Manzambi could create a similar problem, although his methods are different. Where Rogers often overpowered defenders, Manzambi tends to escape them. His first touch, agility and body positioning allow him to receive in crowded areas and emerge facing forward. He protects the ball well, draws contact and accelerates once he has broken the first challenge.


The numbers reinforce that profile. In the 2025/26 Bundesliga season, Manzambi completed 33 take-ons, ranking 14th in the division, while his 69 possessions won in the middle third ranked 18th. He won 146 ground duels, the fourth-highest total in the league, and drew 78 fouls, more than any other player. Together, those figures point to a midfielder who is comfortable operating in contested areas, capable of beating opponents and difficult to dispossess once he starts moving forward.


Villa could use those qualities in the areas Rogers previously occupied, whether receiving in the left half-space, driving directly at the back line or moving inside from a wider starting position. His ability to turn away from pressure and eliminate two or three opponents before accelerating into space could restore some of the disruption that disappeared with Rogers.


The important difference is where Manzambi’s involvement might begin. Rogers was often the player at the end of Villa’s midfield progression, receiving once the ball had already been worked into an advanced area. Manzambi’s box-to-box profile gives him the potential to become involved earlier in the move. That is significant because Tielemans was frequently the player responsible for getting Villa to those attacking positions in the first place.


Replacing Tielemans differently


Tielemans gave Villa’s possession direction. He dropped towards the centre-backs, scanned before receiving and recognised where the next pass needed to go. Sometimes he broke a defensive line immediately; on other occasions, he retained possession long enough for Villa’s attacking structure to form. His influence was as much organisational as technical, providing the connection between Villa’s defensive foundations and the attacking players ahead of him.


Manzambi is not the same type of controller. He does not arrive with Tielemans’ passing range or his experience of setting the rhythm of Premier League matches, and Villa should resist the temptation to turn him into a direct copy. Instead, he could offer Emery another way of solving some of the same problems. Tielemans frequently defeated pressure with a pass; Manzambi could defeat it with a turn.


Rather than receiving deep and releasing someone beyond the opposition midfield, he could take the ball beyond that line himself. Once he has escaped the first challenge, he has the athleticism to continue forward and become part of the next phase.


With Rogers gone, Villa could have looked for another advanced ball-carrier, while replacing Tielemans might have meant signing another deep playmaker. Instead, the missing responsibilities could be redistributed across Manzambi, Boubacar Kamara, João Gomes and the rest of Emery’s midfield.



A possible build-up sequence illustrates how that could work. Kamara drops towards the centre-backs to give Villa security in the first phase, while Gomes moves towards the ball and occupies an opposition midfielder. That movement could open a passing lane into Manzambi behind the first line of pressure. From there, he receives on the half-turn and drives into the advanced area Rogers previously attacked.


Manzambi does not reproduce Tielemans’ exact pass or Rogers’ exact style of dribbling, but within a similar move he can connect deeper possession to the final third in his own way.


Gomes could have an important supporting role in making those movements possible. His pressing, ball-winning and ability to cover ground could provide greater security when Manzambi advances, particularly with Kamara retaining the deepest position. Gomes would not replace Tielemans’ creativity, but he could absorb more of the defensive workload and allow Manzambi greater freedom to move between phases.


That flexibility suits Emery. Manzambi has already operated centrally, from wider positions and closer to the forwards, and his profile could allow Villa to alter their midfield according to the opposition. Against a low block, he could start higher and give Villa another player capable of beating an opponent around the penalty area. Against an aggressive press, he could move towards the ball and provide another route through midfield. In transition, his strength and athleticism could allow him to win possession and immediately turn the regain into an attack.


There is an obvious risk in expecting too much too quickly. Manzambi is 20 and has completed just one full Bundesliga season as a regular starter. Moving between several roles could accelerate his development, but constantly changing his position could also make it harder for him to master any one of them. Villa should not judge him against an imaginary combination of Rogers and Tielemans. He cannot replace everything they offered and should not be expected to; the more realistic challenge is whether his qualities can help Villa function differently without them.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page